Rework the eFuse schematic for readability; 3-resistor OVLO divider
Redraws the eFuse area with proper wires instead of labels-on-pins, and
simplifies the divider that 228ff03 added.
The first draft split R3 into 12 k + 2.2 k to hit 14.2 k, purely to preserve
the original ~8.9 V UVLO. That bought a fourth resistor and a named junction
net (EFUSE_R3MID) that nothing else touched. The ~9 V UVLO turned out to be
an assumption carried over from the original design rather than a requirement:
U3's minimum input is 4.5 V, so relaxing it to 6.78 V costs nothing and is in
fact less likely to chatter if the GC rail sags.
R46 620 k -> 100 k (C25741) R1: 12V_RAW -> EN/UVLO
R47 100 k -> 12.4 k (C11692) R2: EN/UVLO -> OVLO
R48 NEW 10 k (C25744) R3: OVLO -> GND
R49 removed
R45 100 k -> 33 k (C25779) ILIM 0.52 A -> 1.52 A
OVLO is unchanged at 15.18 V typ (14.47-15.78 worst case) against U3's 17 V
limit, so the simplification costs nothing on the parameter that matters.
Verified: 12V_RAW(R46.2) / EFUSE_EN(R46.1,R47.1,U13.5) / EFUSE_OVLO(R47.2,
R48.1,U13.2) / GND(R48.2,R45.2,U13.4); 152 -> 151 components with only R49
removed; ERC 0 violations.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -957,7 +957,7 @@
|
||||
"uuid": "dbb182a6-d579-468e-b98b-6f0950da9e3a"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"used_designators": "C17,#PWR090e1-3,#PWR44-50,R20-21",
|
||||
"used_designators": "C17,#PWR090e1-3,#PWR44-50,#PWR54,R20-21",
|
||||
"variants": []
|
||||
},
|
||||
"sheets": [
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user