a5b4d5bafd
Removing ~9 ns from the MISO path (EXI_J4 merge, the CS mux, then the whole fabric route via an SB_IO output register) left the hardware result BYTE IDENTICAL: 0B 80 at index 5, ok=[1,1,1,1,1,0]. A ~9 ns reduction against an 18.5 ns half-period budget cannot change nothing if propagation were the cause, so it is not, despite being speed-dependent. t_raw_sweep reads the same 8 slots at EVERY speed index and reports the first two bytes per index, so the shift can be seen as a curve rather than a single point: a shift that appears or grows with clock rate is a timing problem, one that is constant across indices is structural. Run against a PHASE_METER bitstream it reads the bit engine's byte phase directly at each speed, with the register file and both byte FIFOs out of the path. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>